Legal Opinion
United States v. Stanford
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided December 28, 2011No. Criminal Action No. H-09-342Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
DAVID HITTNER, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Continuance (Document No. 552). Having thoroughly considered the motion, submissions, and applicable law, the Court issues the following decision.
On June 18, 2009, a federal grand jury for the Southern District of Texas returned a twenty-one count indictment charging Robert Allen Stanford and others with, inter alia, conspiring to commit securities fraud and money laundering, and conspiring to obstruct and obstructing an investigation of the Securities and Exchange…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Efraim Natanel A/K/A Efriam NatanelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Robert Sawyer v. Robert H. Butler, Sr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.