Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Cummings

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 2003No. 49A02-0209-CV-708PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

Larry Fitzgerald appeals the decision of the trial court denying his motion to cor rect error. In particular, Fitzgerald claims that the trial court should have denied Susan Cummings’ motion to set aside the judgment against her because Cummings failed to establish any ground for relief and to show a meritorious defense. In addition, Fitzgerald claims that Cummings did not timely file her motion for relief. Because the trial court could find that Cummings showed excusable neglect and because she testified to a meritorious defense, we find that the trial court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Garling v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Chelovich v. Ruff & Silvian AgencyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Aetna Securities Co. v. SickelsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Pinkston v. LivingstonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Frye v. Vigo CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Prime Mortgage USA, Inc. v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Brimhall v. BrewsterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Shipley v. Keybank National Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Z.S. v. J.F.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State of Indiana v. Chad T. Mooney, Brittany McCoolIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API