Legal Opinion
Frye v. Vigo County
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 4, 2002No. 83A01-0107-CV-246PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTINGLY-MAY, Judge.
Bernard G. Frye and Lyman Roberts Jr. (collectively, the "Citizens") appeal the trial court's judgment denying their requested relief for alleged violations of the Indiana Open Door Law1 by the Vigo County Commissioners (the "Commissioners") and the Grievance Panel 2The Citizens raise numerous issues for our review which we consolidate and restate as: 1) whether the trial court erred in finding there was public notice of executive sessions, 2) whether the Commissioners improperly met in executive sessions with the county attorney and union representatives, 3)…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pepinsky v. Monroe County CouncilIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Simon v. City of Auburn, Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Baker v. Town of MiddleburyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Town of Merrillville v. BlancoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
3Cited by13 opinions
- B.J.B. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Dillman v. Trustees of Indiana UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Hinojosa v. Board of Public Works & SafetyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Fitzgerald v. CummingsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re Direct Criminal Contempt ProceedingsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.