Legal Opinion

Horton v. Helmholtz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1907No. Docket No. 58PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Cheboygan; Mayne, J., presiding. Bill by Charles M. Horton against August C. Helmholtz and James B. Bradley, auditor general, to quiet title to certain land. Defendant Helmholtz, filed an answer in the nature of a cross-bill to establish a title by virtue of certain tax deeds. From a decree for defendant, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The defendant Helmholtz claims title to the land in controversy under various tax titles as follows :(1) A purchase at delinquent sale in May, 1893, for the tax of 1890, at which time the purchaser bought the State’s title, for the years 1883 to 1889, the same having been previously bid in to the State for those years. It is admitted that the State’s title was valid.(2) A purchase at delinquent sale in December, 1893, for the tax of 1891.(3) A purchase at delinquent sale in December, 1895, for the tax of 1893.

*229(4) A purchase at delinquent sale in December, 1896, for the tax of 1894.(5) A…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Youngs v. PoveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Eldridge v. RichmondMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Auditor General v. CliffordMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Hall v. MannMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. O'Connor v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Holmes v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Closser v. McBrideMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Horton v. SallingMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. McQuade v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Forsythe v. City of South St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API