Legal Opinion

Larson v. Dumke

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 9, 1990No. Nos. 88-15440, 89-15124PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDISERT, Senior Circuit Judge:

We are to decide if the district court abused its discretion in dismissing a derivative suit brought by a substantial shareholder on behalf of a corporation. Other issues are present, but our decision essentially turns on whether, as found by the trial court, the plaintiff sought to rescind an Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP). If that was the relief sought, there exists a strong argument that the plaintiff could not qualify as an adequate representative because he was “economically antagonistic” toward the corporation and other shareholders. Rule 23.1,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davis v. Comed, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  2. G. A. Enterprises, Inc. v. Leisure Living Communities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
  3. Catherine Wilson Nolen, on Behalf of Herself and All Other Stockholders of the Shaw-Walker Company v. The Shaw-Walker CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  4. Halsted Video, Inc. v. GuttilloDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
  5. Lewis v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. United States v. Anthony Ray Jefferson and Roosevelt Jefferson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Elgin v. Alfa Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. May v. CoffeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,247 Andrew L. Smith, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Smith Protective Services, Inc. v. R. Jack Ayres, R. Jack AyresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API