Legal Opinion

Richard Nelson Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 22, 1973No. C.D. 4467; Court No. 66/19050PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Kao, Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case, described on the invoices as “Black Sheathing Hoofing Felt,” was assessed with duty at 20 per centum ad valorem under item 355.05, Tariff Schedules of the United States, which item includes nonwoven fabrics, felts, and bonded fabrics, whether or not coated or filled. It is claimed to be dutiable at 5 per centum ad valorem under item 251.05, which covers building papers and building paper-felts, whether or not coated or saturated.

The pertinent provisions of the tariff schedules are as follows:

Schedule 3 - Part 4 - Subpart C

Subpart C headnotes:

2.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. F. L. Smidth & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  2. Nomura (America) Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  3. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Dietemann v. Time, IncorporatedDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1968
  5. Floral Arts Studios v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Miracle Exclusives, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API