Dietemann v. Time, Incorporated
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARR, District Judge.
This is a diversity suit for invasion of privacy seeking $100,000.00 general damages and $200,000.00 exemplary damages. Plaintiff, a disabled veteran with little education, was engaged in the-practice of healing with clay, minerals, and herbs — -as practiced, simple quackery.
Defendant, Time, Incorporated, a New York corporation, publishes Life Magazine. Its November 1, 1963 edition carried an article entitled “Crackdown on Quackery.” The article depicted plaintiff as a quack and included two pictures of him. One picture was taken at plaintiff’s home on September…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- On Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Crump v. Beckley Newspapers, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. John A. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- A. A. Dietemann v. Time, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Galella v. OnassisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Jensen v. SawyersUtah Supreme Court · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.