Legal Opinion
Farrall v. Armstrong Cork Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided January 28, 1983PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALSH, Judge.
In this products liability action a former asbestos worker seeks recovery for certain pulmonary ailments he sustained as the result of his alleged exposure to asbestos products manufactured or distributed by the primary defendants, Keene Corporation, Armstrong Cork Company, Atlas Asbestos Corporation and Gale Corporation. Plaintiff’s wife also seeks recovery, derivatively for loss of consortium and directly for alleged asbestos contamination as a result of handling her husband’s clothing. Two of the primary defendants, Gale and Armstrong, have joined as third-party defendants a…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bryson, Paul E. v. Brand Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Smither and Company, Inc. v. Franciska T. ColesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Kofron v. Amoco Chemicals Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Diamond State Telephone Co. v. University of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
- Douglas v. E. & J. GALLO WINERYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bovsun v. SanperiNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Nutt v. AC & S. CO., INC.Superior Court of Delaware · 1986
- Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- John J. Marchica v. Long Island Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- In Re Asbestos LitigationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.