Legal Opinion

City of Indianapolis v. State ex rel. Barnett

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1909No. 21,354PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From Marion Circuit Court (16,307); Henry Clay Allen, Judge. Action by The State of Indiana, on the relation of James H. Barnett and others, against the City of Indianapolis and others. From a judgment for the plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

In 1907 the board of public works of appellant city, by regular proceedings, caused the paving with brick of State street, from English avenue to Prospect street. On August 30 the board accepted said work, and caused a primary assessment roll to be made out, as required by statute. Notice of a hearing, as provided in section 111 of the act of 1905 (Acts 1905,'pp. 219, 292, §8716 Burns 1908), having been given, divers persons, who had been assessed benefits, appeared before the board, and remonstrated against their several assessments as excessive. The board considered the several complaints,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hovey v. NobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Board of Commissioners v. GwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. City of Terre Haute v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Wilkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. State ex rel. Burroughs v. WebsterIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Leek v. TheisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. Hobson v. HansenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
  3. Sedlak v. DickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  4. State Ex Rel. Buttz v. Marion Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  5. City of Indianapolis v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API