Legal Opinion

Krebs Manufacturing Co. v. Brown

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1895PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court. Tried before Hon. Jas. J. BANKS. . The opinion sufficiently shows the facts. The demurrers to plaintiff’s plea should have been sustained. — Mayberry v. Leech, 58 Ala. 339 ; Culver v. Hill, 68 Ala. 66; Washing.ton v. Timberlake, 74 Ala. 259; Dougherty v. Am. Un. Tel. Co., 75 Ala. 168. No brief for appellee in the record.

1Opinion of the CourtHead, J.

According to the plea, the plaintiff contracted with the defendant to put in, for the latter, a window in a storehouse occupied by defendant, at the price of $26. The window was to be put in, in first class order and workmanship, in every way, but, as the ple.a alleges, the plaintiff.did the work in a negligent andun-.skillful manner, .and on account of the work being done so poorly, the rain came in through the window, where the same was connected to the,house, and.damaged certain specified articles of property belonging to the. defendant,-to the extent of $261.25, which sum.defendant offers…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Culver v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. Young & Co. v. CuretonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Benedict Pineapple Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BarnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Massey v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Burnett Bean v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Birmingham R. L. & P. Co. v. SpragueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API