Young & Co. v. Cureton
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Etowah. Tried before the Hon. John B. Tally. cited Bell v. Reynolds & Lee, 75 Ala. 511; Martin v. Hill, 42 Ala. 275; Gray v. Waterman, 40 111. 522; Robertson v. Davenport & Patterson, 27 Ala. 574; Tucker v. Woods, 12 John. 190; 11 John. 525; 1 Peters, 465; Baroque v. Russell, 7 Ala. 798; Cuthbert ,v. Newell, 7 Ala. 457; 40 N. T. 422; 9 Wend. 325; 17 C. B. 21. cited Haas v. Hudmon, 83 Ala. 176; Brigham v. Carlisle, 78 Ala. 247; Pollock v.…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Etowah. Tried before the Hon. John B. Tally. cited Bell v. Reynolds & Lee, 75 Ala. 511; Martin v. Hill, 42 Ala. 275; Gray v. Waterman, 40 111. 522; Robertson v. Davenport & Patterson, 27 Ala. 574; Tucker v. Woods, 12 John. 190; 11 John. 525; 1 Peters, 465; Baroque v. Russell, 7 Ala. 798; Cuthbert ,v. Newell, 7 Ala. 457; 40 N. T. 422; 9 Wend. 325; 17 C. B. 21. cited Haas v. Hudmon, 83 Ala. 176; Brigham v. Carlisle, 78 Ala. 247; Pollock v. Gantt, 69 Ala. 376; Refining Co. v. Barton, 77 Ala. 156; Culver v. Hill, 68 Ala. 66; Parsons v. Sutton, 66 Ala. 92; 2 Benj.…
1Opinion of the CourtClopton, J.
In this action, which was brought by appellee to recover the price of three barrels of. whiskey, the defendants seek by special plea to recoup damages suffered by the alleged breach of an executory contract. The plea avers, that in November, 1887, plaintiff and defendants entered into a contract, by which the former agreed to deliver to the latter ten barrels of corn whiskey, at an agreed price, by the 25th day of December thereafter, and that the barrels in controversy were delivered in pursuance of such agreement, but that plaintiff failed to deliver the other seven barrels. All the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brigham & Co. v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Pollock & Co. v. GanttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Bell v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Culver v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Montgomery & West Point Railroad v. VarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Atlanta & Birmingham A. L. Ry. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BarnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Ansley v. Bank of PiedmontSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
- Crandall-Pettee Co. v. Jebeles & Colias Conf. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Alabama National Bank v. HalseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.