Legal Opinion

Faucett v. Riveroll

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1928No. Docket No. L.A. 9128PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Action to recover the balance due for grading streets, filling in certain lots, and removing earth from others in a tract of land in the city of Beverly Hills, in the county of Los Angeles, and to foreclose a lien upon said tract of land for said unpaid balance. The prayer of the complaint was as follows: “Wherefore plaintiff prays judgment against defendants for the sum of $5,357.70, with interest from January 28, 1925, and costs; that said sum be declared to be a lien upon the lands heretofore mentioned; that said lands may be ordered sold to satisfy such lien, and that the proceeds may be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Olcott v. KohlsaatNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Culbertson v. CizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Wm. J. Bettingen Lumber Co. v. KerrinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Adolph v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API