Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard Taglianetti
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 10, 1972No. 71-1364 to 71-1366PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Chief Judge.
Defendants Taglianetti, Stefano, and Ricci were found guilty by a jury of making, and using extortionate means to collect an extension of credit. 18 U.S.C. §§ 892 and 894. The victim was one Poisson, who was the government's principal witness. No purpose would be served in summarizing the government’s evidence, as no defendant considers it insufficient, except that Taglianetti says it fails to show his own participation. We may dispose of that claim very briefly. An after-hours meeting at an auto shop with all defendants present, and at which Poisson was roughed up and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fong Foo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Howard J. CotterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- In the Matter of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
- Hilliard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- James Mims v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Arthur BarrettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Wells Real Estate, Inc. v. Greater Lowell Board of RealtorsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- William B. Smith v. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Heinz Wartski v. Terence W. Bedford, (Two Cases) Heinz Wartski v. Terence W. BedfordCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Douglas D. OlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.