Shah v. Lehman

GRIMM, Presiding Judge.

This is a medical malpractice action. The trial court granted defendants’ summary judgment motion on the basis that the statute of limitations barred plaintiffs1 suit.

On appeal, plaintiffs brief contains only one point, with two issues. First, she alleges that although defendants-surgeons intentionally placed a cement restrictor into her leg, its present location constitutes a “foreign object.” As such, she contends, the foreign object exception tolls the statute of limitations. Second, she alleges that several subsequent surgeries at the same hospital “by both its…