Legal Opinion
Duncan v. Spivak
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 6, 2001No. F034907PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
114 Cal.Rptr.2d 166 (2001)
94 Cal.App.4th 245
Russell DUNCAN, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
Yemelyan SPIVAK, Defendant and Respondent. Shari Duncan, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
Yemelyan Spivak, Defendant and Respondent.
No. F034907.
Court of Appeal, Fifth District.
December 6, 2001.
Review Denied February 27, 2002.[*]
Jeffrey L. Wall, Fresno; Wills & Benoit, Thomas W. Wills, Salinas; Richter & Rouhani, Michael Richter; and Carl A. Mounteer, Monterey, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth, Mario L. Beltramo, Jr., and Patrick M. Martucci, Fresno, for Defendant and…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. RowlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clarence Matz, et ux v. Wuest DiagnosticsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003