Legal Opinion

Edgewater Investment Associates v. Borough of Edgewater

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 10, 1986PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

STEIN, J.

This case concerns the constitutionality of the Senior Citizens and Disabled Protected Tenancy Act. N.J.S.A. 2A:18-61.22 to -61.39 (Act). In a well-reasoned opinion, the Appellate Division upheld the statutory scheme in the face of plaintiffs assertion that the Act violated the “takings” and “contract” clauses of the United States and New Jersey Constitutions. 201 N.J.Super. 267 (1985).

We affirm the judgment below for substantially the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Baime. We write only to address three narrow issues not fully…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  3. Phillips v. CurialeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  4. Oberhand v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  5. Caviglia v. Royal Tours of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API