Legal Opinion
United States v. Carlos Arturo Ocampo, United States of America v. Jorge Arango, United States of America v. Jerald James Donato
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 1, 1991No. 89-50332, 89-50344, 89-50434PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Chief Judge:
Ocampo, Donato, and Arango appeal from their convictions for possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and conspiracy, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Arango and Ocampo also appeal their sentences. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231. We have jurisdiction over these timely appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reverse the conviction of Ocampo, affirm the conviction of Dona-to, and affirm both the conviction and sentence of Arango.
I
The police investigation began with a tip followed by surveillance.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Charles Anderson Miller v. Daniel B. Vasquez, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Anthony Ruiz Del VizoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Narcisa SavinovichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Hector Hernan HoyosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- United States v. Isabel Rodriguez De VaronCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Arturo Garcia Parra and Magdalena CorreaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Patrick InnieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Alexander Montagu HayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.