Legal Opinion
Hill v. Fidelity Financial Services (In Re Hill)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 15, 1993No. Bankruptcy No. 3-92-03130, Adv. No. 3-92-0322PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
THOMAS F. WALDRON, Bankruptcy Judge.
This proceeding, which arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) in a case referred to this court by the Standing Order of Reference entered in this district on July 30, 1984, is determined to be a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(F) — proceedings to determine, recover, or avoid preferences.
Pending before the court are motions for summary judgment (Doc. 12-1, 16-1) filed by the plaintiff, the debtor, James Lee Hill (the “Debtor”), 1…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bruce v. RepublicBank-South Austin (In Re Bruce)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re MaylinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1993
- In Re TorontoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- Kildow v. EMC Mortgage Corp. (In Re Kildow)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999
- In Re BinghiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Miller v. Brotherhood Credit Union (In Re Miller)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.