Rosales v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CARROLL, Chief Justice.
George Rosales and Ester Rivera sued State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance to recover underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits under a Texas Standard Liability Policy issued to Sharon Barrett. The trial court concluded that Rosales and Rivera could not obtain both liability and UIM benefits under a single insurance policy, and granted summary judgment in favor of State Farm. Rosales and Rivera do not argue that genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment in this cause, but that the trial court incorrectly applied substantive law to reach an erroneous result.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Liberty Insurance Company v. RanzauTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York v. GatlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- American Motorists Insurance Company v. BriggsTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Cozzaglio v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Berry v. Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jankowiak v. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Co. v. Griffin, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
- Bergensen v. Hartford Insurance Co. of the Midwest, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
- State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Conn, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1992
- Parekh v. MittadarLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.