Legal Opinion

Bergensen v. Hartford Insurance Co. of the Midwest

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided December 17, 1992No. 01-91-01467-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILSON, Justice.

The appellant, Margot Bergensen, appeals the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the appellees, Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest (“Hartford”) and Harry Bergensen. Specifically, appellant attacks a policy exclusion applied to her as contrary to public policy. We affirm.

Hartford issued a Texas Personal Auto Policy to the Bergensens, effective from January 1987, to January 1988, which included uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage. Harry Bergensen and Margot Bergensen, husband and wife, were the “named insureds” shown in the declarations.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stracener v. United Services Automobile Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Scarborough v. Employers Casualty Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)1991
  3. Conlin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Rosales v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1994
  2. Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. Andrew Mata and Oscar Mata v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
  4. Garza v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
  5. Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company v. Artemiz Freeman, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API