Shultz v. State

OPINION

MATHIAS, Judge

Timothy Shultz was convicted after a bench trial of three counts of receiving stolen property. He raises four issues, which we restate as the following two dis-positive issues:

I. Whether the warrantless entry and search of Shultz’s property violates the Fourth Amendment or Article I, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution; and

II. Whether Shultz’s conviction(s) are supported by sufficient evidence.

We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Facts and Procedural History

In the course of investigating the theft of a semi-tractor, police suspicion began to focus on Timothy Shultz,…