Legal Opinion

State v. Whitecotton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Shelby Circuit Court. — Hon. Andrew Ellison, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBond, J.

The defendants entered into a recognizance for the appearance of Frank Whitecotton, who had been, jointly with another person, indicted for robbery in Ralls county, Missouri, and convicted, after severance and change of venue, in Shelby county, Missouri. The record entry of the recognizance of defendants is, to wit:

“State of Missouri,

v.

“Frank Whitecotton.
“Now on this twenty-second day of December, 1891, at three o’clock, p. M., came James 0. Allison and James T. Lloyd, who prosecute for the state and cause, also the defendant, Frank Whitecotton, in his own proper person and by his attorneys,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  2. State v. PostonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  3. The People v. . TubbsNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  4. State v. PeytonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Welborn v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AustinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  2. State v. CharlesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. State v. AustinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API