Davis v. Davis
New York Supreme Court
Separate actions by Carrie C. Davis, administratrix of E. Louise Davison, deceased, against the Citizens’ Savings .Bank and against the Seamen’s Bank for Savings, in which Emma L. Davis was inter-pleaded. Judgment for plaintiff in both actions.
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
These two actions are brought by Carrie C. Davis, as administratrix of E. Louise Davison, to recover two savings bank deposits standing in the name of plaintiff’s intestate in the Citizens’ Saving Bank and the Seamen’s Bank for Savings, respectively. They were brought originally against the banks, but later the defendant Emma L. Davis was interpleaded and the bank was taken out as defendant. They were tried together, and are submitted on the same evidence. In her answer the defendant sets up a counterclaim alleging that prior to her death E. Louise Davison made her a gift of the two. bank…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Beaver v. . BeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Ridden v. . ThrallNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Grymes v. . HoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Clift v. . MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Gannon v. . McGuireNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sullivan v. SheaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Van Cleef v. MaxfieldNew York Supreme Court · 1918
- In re the Estate of SteinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1966