Van Cleef v. Maxfield
New York Supreme Court
Action tried before the court and a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtJaycox, J.
At the conclusion of the testimony both parties moved for the direction of a verdict and the court thereupon directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Then the defendant asked to withdraw his request for the direction of a verdict and asked to go to the jury “ on the ground that the defendant has made a question of fact as to whether those loans were cancelled by the deceased. ’ ’ This motion was denied, denial excepted to and thereupon the defendant moved to set aside the verdict and asked the court to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant. These are the motions now before the court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Beaver v. . BeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Young v. . YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- In Re the Accounting of Van AlstyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- McKenzie v. . HarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Westerlo v. . De WittNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re the Estate of CarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of BrownNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
- Baltes v. KliefWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Berry v. BerryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
- Estate of Austin v. AustinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.