Legal Opinion
United States v. Howell
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided August 31, 1983No. SPCM 17785PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CLARKE, Senior Judge:
Appellant was convicted by a special court-martial with members of four specifications of larceny. On appeal he challenges the admissibility of photographs taken by a bank’s Automated Teller Machine (ATM). He also contests the propriety of his photographic identification by his roommate. We affirm, holding that such photographs are admissible under Military Rule of Evidence 901(a) and that the photographic identification did not improperly invade the province of the fact finders.
The evidence at trial showed that on 28, 29, 30 and 31 December 1981, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. BowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- United States v. Gary Thomas ButcherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Willie Calhoun, A/K/A Calvin CalhounCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Stephanie K. StearnsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Fisher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. McNuttCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
- United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
- United States v. HarrisNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
- United States v. ReichartU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. McNuttArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.