Legal Opinion
United States v. Reichart
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
Decided July 26, 1990No. ACMR 8802252PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM: *
Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer members of larceny of two candy bars in violation of Article 121 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. His approved sentence was a dismissal from the service.
We have considered the following issue raised by appellate defense counsel:
WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY FAILING TO SUPPRESS THE VIDEOTAPE IN LIGHT OF THE GOVERNMENT’S FAILURE TO ESTABLISH A PROPER FOUNDATION?
We conclude that the military judge did not err…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Joseph Hendricks v. Harold R. Swenson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Gordon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- State v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- Fisher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
- United States v. Freddie Lee Taylor and James Crawford HicksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
- United States v. HarrisNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
- United States v. PerezU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. SchnableNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006
- United States v. BakerUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995