Legal Opinion

Cass v. Washington Finance Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1933No. Docket No. 10, Calendar No. 36,518PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff sued defendants on a promissory note as follows:

“July 18,. 1928.
“On September 2, ,1931, we promise to pay to the order of Ohio Boulevard Land Company, Two Thousand Two Hundred ninety-séven and 73/100 ..................Dollars at Griswold First State Bank.
“ Value received with interest at the rate of six per cent, per annum.
“Washington Finance. Co.
“By: Henry Friedman, Pres.
“A. A. Foreman, Treas.
“105 Colorado Avenue.”

Indorsements on back of note:

“Henry Friedman,. “105 Colorado.
“Ohio Boulevard Land Co.,
“1201 Lafayette Bldg.
“By: Julius Berman, Pres.
“Julius Berman,
“1201 Lafayette Bldg.
“Pa…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dempsey v. LangtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Kaunitz v. WheelerMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. McDonald v. StaplesMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Lammie v. KlugMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API