Legal Opinion

Byrd v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 13, 2008No. Civil Action 06-00522 (HHK)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HENRY H. KENNEDY, JR., District Judge.

Plaintiffs Garrina Byrd, Annette Burns, Demera Gaskins, and Carmen Jean-Baptiste are former employees of the District of Columbia Department of Parks and Recreation (“the Department”). They bring this action against the District of Columbia (“the District”) alleging that they experienced sexual discrimination and harassment while employed at the Department. Plaintiffs allege violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), the District of Columbia Human Rights Act, D.C.Code §§…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jo v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  2. Craig v. Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Owens v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Francis v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  5. Mpoy v. FentyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API