Legal Opinion

Signorelli v. Miller

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1942No. Civ. 13495PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, P. J.

In an action for damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile collision, nominal liability of the defendant in favor of plaintiff Helen Signorelli (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff) was admitted. The ease was tried and submitted to a jury on the sole issue of the amount of damages. The jury awarded plaintiff $275. Her motion for a new trial was denied. She prosecutes this appeal and states the only question involved, as follows: “Considering the undisputed evidence of injury presented on behalf of the plaintiff . . . was the verdict and judgment of $275.00 adequate in amount…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Dell v. HjorthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Macart v. San Joaquin Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harris v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Dickinson v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Cornell v. Hearst Sunical Land & Packing Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Von Breton v. HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Flanton v. GreenfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API