Roddan v. Doane
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
Defendant appealed from the judgment on a bill of exceptions within sixty days after its rendition.
The action was for money had and received by defendant's intestate, and it is contended that the claim presented to the administratrix had not been rejected before the commencement of the action. The notice to creditors required them to present their claims to the administratrix at the office of E. W. McGraw, Esq., 318 California Street, San Francisco.
June 25, 1889, plaintiff went to the office indicated, and the administratrix, not being present, left his claim for her, and took a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Miller v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Bollinger v. ManningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by10 opinions
- Barclay v. BlackintonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Cowgill v. DinwiddieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Roche Valley Land Co. v. BarthMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- Seattle National Bank v. DickinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Von Breton v. HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.