Legal Opinion

Molnar v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 24, 1946No. 249, Docket 20158PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The question presented by the petition to review the order of the Tax Court determining a deficiency of $3,684.71 in the income tax of the taxpayer Molnar for the year 1941 is whether the latter has established that any part of the lump-sum payments he received from American motion pictures producers for his world .motion picture rights constituted income from sources outside of the United States within the meaning of Sections 119 and 212 of the Internal Revenue Code.1

On April 17, 1941 the taxpayer, a citizen *925of Hungary, entered into a written contract in New…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. Rohmer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. Estate of Marton v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1942

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Phoenix Coal Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  2. Misbourne Pictures Limited v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  3. Wodehouse v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  4. Wodehouse v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  5. Goosen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API