Legal Opinion

Wodehouse v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 21, 1949No. 5694PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOBIE,, Circuit Judge.

This case has been before us once before, 4 Cir., 166 F.2d 986. There, with one judge dissenting, we held that lump-sum. payments, received in 1938 and 1941 by nonresident alien author from domestic publisher under agreement requiring publisher to obtain copyright on contents of its periodical and reassign to author on demand after serial publication had been completed all rights in story except American serial rights, were not within revenue statute imposing tax on dividends, etc., or other fixed or determinable “annual or periodical gains,” but were exempt as proceeds…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fairmont Aluminum Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
  2. White v. Fitzpatrick, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  3. Carrión Pacheco v. Tesorero de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1956
  4. Stanback v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  5. THOIP v. Walt Disney Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API