Kakkar v. United States
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 5:13-cr-00736-EJD-1 9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT 10 v. SENTENCE PURSUANT TO
28 U.S.C. § 2255
11 SANJIV KAKKAR, 12 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 201 13 Before the Court is Defendant Sanjiv Kakkar’s
28 U.S.C. § 2255
motion to vacate, set 14 aside, or correct his sentence for wire fraud and making false statements to a bank. See Motion 15 Under
28 U.S.C. § 2255
to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody 16…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.