Legal Opinion

United States v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 16, 1961No. Admiralty No. 4278PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

This is a suit by the United States to recover from respondent Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., and its surety “additional charter hire” alleged to be due the government under a bareboat charter of three government vessels.

*523The first two causes of action seek a judgment (1) declaring the rights and obligations of the parties with respect to the payment of additional charter hire under sec. 709(a) of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, 46 U.S.C.A. § 1199(a), and Clause 6 of Charter Contract No. MA-153, and (2) directing respondents to pay to the government as such additional charter…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. American-Foreign Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Callanan Road Improvement Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Sword Line, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Sword Line, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johns Hopkins University v. HuttonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
  2. United States v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc., and Indemnity Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  3. Massachusetts Trustees of Eastern Gas & Fuel Associates v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1962
  4. American President Lines, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API