Legal Opinion
Mirman v. Reconstruction Finance Corp
Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided February 7, 1952No. 561PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
194 F.2d 290
MIRMAN et al.
v.
RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORP.
No. 561.
United States Emergency Court of Appeals.
Heard at Cleveland, Ohio, December 18, 1951.
Decided February 7, 1952.
Paul W. Walter, Cleveland, Ohio, with whom D. Rusk Haverfield and F. Wilson Chockley, Jr., Cleveland, Ohio, Counsel and James Perkins Parker, Co-Counsel, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for complainants.
Maurice S. Meyer, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., with whom J. Gregory Bruce, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for Reconstruction Finance Corporation.
Before…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Armour & Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Emergency Court of Appeals · 1947
- Lakemore Co. v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Armour & Co. of Delaware v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Bowman v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
- San Antonio Packing Co. v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. TambascoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1956
- Frank L. Smith v. Franklin Floete, Administrator, General Services Administration, Successor to Reconstruction Finance CorporationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1959