Legal Opinion
United States v. Tambasco
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided August 3, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 5136PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLEY, District Judge.
The government plaintiff moves for summary judgment. The action is another one of the troublesome ones, at least for me, to recover for substantial livestock slaughter subsidy payments paid to the defendant by the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, under Section 2(e) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 902(e). The United States, as the plaintiff herein, filed the complaint under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1345, in this Court on January 26, 1954. The claim relates to subsidy payments made in May and June, 1946, and pursuant…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cherry Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. BorinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Riverview Packing Co., Inc. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp. Appeal of Reconstruction Finance Corp. Appeal of Riverview Packing Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- United States v. Bass. Bass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- H. P. Coffee Company v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. BeardDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1956
- United States v. BeardDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1957
- United States v. Edward Beard and Al. J. Beard, Formerly D/B/A A. J. Beard & SonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958