Legal Opinion
Bowman v. Bowles
Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided February 24, 1944No. 88PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAWS, Judge.
This case involves the application to complainants’ housing accommodations in Cincinnati, Ohio, of rent regulations established by the Price Administrator pursuant to the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, SO U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq. At the time this proceeding was commenced, two principal rent regulations were effective in the Cincinnati Defense-Rental Area. One, designated Rent Regulation for Housing (referred to in this opinion as the Housing Regulation), provided control over rents for housing accommodations other than hotels and rooming houses; the other, designated Rent…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Taylor v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Chatlos v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Lakemore Co. v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Madison Park Corporation v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Armour & Co. of Delaware v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of New York v. New York Telephone Co.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1972
- Great Northern Co-op. Ass'n v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
- Saunders Petroleum Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
- Edwards v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Fast v. Di Salle, Director of Price StabilizationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.