Legal Opinion

United States v. Zalapa

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 5, 2007No. 06-50487PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

We hold that a defendant who fails to object in the district court to multiplicitous convictions and sentences does not waive his or her right to raise a double jeopardy challenge on appeal. Because we conclude that the district court plainly erred by sentencing the appellant Joseph Manuel Zalapa on multiplicitous firearm counts and entering judgment, we reverse.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

On October 20, 2005, officers in the Santa Ana, California Police Department (“SAPD”) were in a parking lot investigating the presence of a stolen vehicle. While in the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. United States v. OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Denard NealCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. TannCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. Del Toro-BarbozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API