Legal Opinion
People v. Hoagland
California Supreme Court
Decided January 17, 1903No. Crim. No. 918PublishedCited by 7 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Albert Meyers, appellant, was informed against, with two other defendants, for the crime of larceny, committed by stealing a cow from one Lacy Gray in Trinity County, and driving said cow to Mendocino County and there selling her. Appellant was granted a separate trial and was found guilty. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying motion for a new trial.
It is claimed that the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict. We entirely agree with defendant in this contention. It appears that Gray missed a cow early in January, 1902, and employed one…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. MainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. BunkersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- State ex rel. Allen v. Town of Phil CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- McCormick v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
- People v. SciaroniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.