Legal Opinion

People v. King

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 16, 1940No. Crim. 400PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Appellant and one Bob Jarvis were charged jointly in an information with the crime of grand theft from the person of one Melvyn West. The jury acquitted Jarvis and convicted King. King appealed from the judgment and an order denying his motion for new trial.

The points relied upon by appellant for the reversal of the judgment and order are (1) that the verdict is contrary to the law and evidence; (2) that the court erred in deciding questions of law arising during the course of the trial; (3) that the district attorney was guilty of prejudicial misconduct in his argument to the jury; and (4)…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. NegraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. People v. TedescoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. People v. FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. People v. GidneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. People v. SuticCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. People v. GoldsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. People v. WillmurthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API