Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Barbara Combs v. Commissioner of Social Security

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 16, 2006No. 04-5275Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGriffin, Circuit Judge

I concur in the result of the plurality’s opinion for the claimed disability period post-October 25, 1999. However, I respectfully dissent from the denial of plaintiffs claim for disability benefits for the period of May 30, 1996, through October 25, 1999. Regarding this portion of plaintiffs claim arising prior to the repeal of Listing 9.09, I would remand for a new hearing with instructions to apply 9.09 to the closed period.

I

Title 42 U.S.C. § 405(a) provides the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) with the authority to make reasonable rules and regulations that are…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Fernandez-Vargas v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Carolyn S. Longworth v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API