Legal Opinion
Rosenberg v. Weisberger
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 19, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArkwright, J.
The defendant, Samuel M. Halperin, moves for judgment on the pleadings in his favor, and for a dismissal of the complaint as to him for legal insufficiency.
*199The complaint contains two counts. The first is against the defendants Weisberger and Harwood for breach of contract to share real estate brokerage commissions with plaintiff. The second is against all three defendants predicated upon an alleged conspiracy by said defendants to interfere with the agreement set forth in the first cause of action and to deprive the plaintiff of the benefits thereof. But for the said conspiracy, it is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Simon v. Noma Electric Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Louis C. Moser & Co. v. KremerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1948
- Tatarsky v. Wavecrest Building Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
3Cited by3 opinions
- Horn v. SethCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Katz v. Thompson, New York County Courts1959
- Horn v. SethCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978