Legal Opinion
Katz v. Thompson
New York County Courts
Decided July 22, 1959PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames D. Hopkins, J.
The defendants Terzian appeal from an order of the City Court of Peekskill, denying their motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency. The plaintiff is a real estate broker. The defendant Thompson was the owner of realty in the City of Peekskill. The moving defendants are the purchasers of such realty from the defendant Thompson.
For the purposes of this motion the allegations of the facts pleaded are admitted (Lamb v. Cheney & Sons, 227 N. Y. 418, 420). The ultimate question is whether the facts as stated constitute a cause of action against the defendants Terzian. The complaint states…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Brackett v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Lamb v. S. Cheney & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Green v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Union Car Advertising Co. v. CollierNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mead Corporation v. MasonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Rudoff v. Huntington Symphony Orchestra, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1977
- Julien J. Studley, Inc. v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Interstate Cigar Co. v. I.B.I. Security Service, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1980
- Pilger v. RamatiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.