Pollard v. ETS PC, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND DISMISS ALL CLAIMS
William J. Martinez, United States District Judge
This is an action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. Plaintiff Carolyn Pollard and those who have opted in to this action (“Plaintiffs”) claim that Defendants failed to pay proper overtime compensation. . (ECF No. 1.)
Currently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss All Claims (“Motion to Compel”). (ECF No. 67.) Defendants assert that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Frazier v. W. Union Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2019
- Green v. Fishbone Safety Solutions, Ltd.District Court, D. Colorado · 2018
- Torgerson v. LCC International, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2017
- Peck v. Encana Oil & Gas, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2016
- Brayman v. Keypoint Government Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.