Legal Opinion

Precision Rubber Products Corp. v. George McCarthy, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 25, 1989No. 87-5128PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant George McCarthy (McCarthy) was a manufacturer’s representative for plaintiff-appellee Precision Rubber Products Corporation (Precision). McCarthy solicited business for Precision from various automobile manufacturers, including General Motors, Ford, Chrysler, and Volvo. Customer offers to purchase were placed in the form of customer purchase orders which were delivered to Precision. Each customer offered to purchase the seller’s product, pursuant to terms and conditions which it incorporated into its individual purchase order, wherein the purchaser…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Twin City Pipe Line Co. v. Harding Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Laclede Gas Company, Doing Business as Midwest Missouri Gas Company v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  3. John M. Robich v. Patent Button Company of Tennessee, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  4. Butler v. AttwoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart Corporation, Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. M & C Corp. v. Erwin Behr GMBH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  3. General Motors Corp. v. Paramount Metal Products Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
  4. M & C Corporation v. Erwin Behr Gmbh & Co., KgCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API