Legal Opinion

Butler v. Attwood

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 12, 1966No. Nos. 16763, 16808PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, George W. Butler, sought a decree requiring defendant Charles W. Attwood1 and the several defendants Finzel to transfer to Butler one half of those shares of stock of a Michigan corporation, Unistrut Corporation, which had become the subject of a buy-and-sell agreement between Attwood and the Finzels. Right to such relief was bottomed upon a claim that an antecedent contract between Butler and Attwood entitled Butler to purchase one-half of any stock in the corporation which became available for purchase by Attwood. Butler offered, with proper…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Borg-Warner Corp. v. Anchor Coupling Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Kent v. KleinMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Duke v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Morris v. BallardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. M & C Corp. v. Erwin Behr GMBH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. M & C Corporation v. Erwin Behr Gmbh & Co., KgCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Currency $11,331District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
  4. Precision Rubber Products Corp. v. George McCarthy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MulliganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API