Butler v. Attwood
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, George W. Butler, sought a decree requiring defendant Charles W. Attwood1 and the several defendants Finzel to transfer to Butler one half of those shares of stock of a Michigan corporation, Unistrut Corporation, which had become the subject of a buy-and-sell agreement between Attwood and the Finzels. Right to such relief was bottomed upon a claim that an antecedent contract between Butler and Attwood entitled Butler to purchase one-half of any stock in the corporation which became available for purchase by Attwood. Butler offered, with proper…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Borg-Warner Corp. v. Anchor Coupling Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1958
- Kent v. KleinMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Duke v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Morris v. BallardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- M & C Corp. v. Erwin Behr GMBH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- M & C Corporation v. Erwin Behr Gmbh & Co., KgCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Currency $11,331District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
- Precision Rubber Products Corp. v. George McCarthy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MulliganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.