Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. v. Paramount Metal Products Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 28, 2000No. 98-CV-60287-AAPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND; DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTION AS MOOT

STEEH, District Judge.

Plaintiffs General Motors Corporation (“GMC”), Woodbridge Corporation, Wood-bridge Foam Corporation, and Cartex Corporation (collectively ‘Woodbridge”) move for summary judgement of: (1) defendant Paramount Metal Products Company’s counterclaims of fraud, breach of a duty of good faith and fair dealing, and punitive damages; (2) defendant’s counterclaim for unliquidated damages, and; (3) defendant’s…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re National Steel Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
  2. Eberspaecher North America, Inc. v. Van-Rob, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
  3. Bayshore Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Aleris Aluminum Canada L.P. v. Valeo, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
  5. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API