Legal Opinion
Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Metropolitan Airports Commission
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 24, 2000No. Civ. 98-1327 (JRT/FLN)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TUNHEIM, District Judge.
Plaintiff Enterprise Leasing Company (“Enterprise”) brings this action against the Metropolitan Airports Commission (“MAC”) under the Commerce, Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the United States Constitution, the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Minnesota Constitution, and section 473.651 of the Minnesota Statutes. Enterprise’s claims arise from MAC’S enactment of an ordinance that imposes a fee on certain automobile rental agencies who transact business on airport property. This matter is before the Court on MAC’S…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Evansville-Vanderburgh Airport Authority District v. Delta Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. County of KentSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Vette Company and Kansas City Boneless Beef, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Enterprise Leasing Company, Doing Business as Enterprise Rent-A-Car, a Minnesota Corporation v. Metropolitan Airports Commission, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Enterprise Leasing v. Metropolitan AirportCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001