Legal Opinion

Read v. Employment Security Department

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 5, 1991No. 25963-6-IPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

Jack Read, Earl Frederick, and James Christensen assert in this consolidated appeal that the trial court erred by affirming the findings of the Commissioner of the Employment Security Department (the Department) that each claimant voluntarily left his employment with Tacoma News, Inc., without good cause pursuant to RCW 50.20.050 and, thus, did not qualify for unemployment benefits. We affirm.

On July 12, 1988, Tacoma News circulated a memorandum in its various departments announcing the implementation of an early retirement plan for qualified employees, largely because of the company's need…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Safeco Insurance v. MeyeringWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Rasmussen v. Department of Employment SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Kenna v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  5. Murphy v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Casper Iron & Metal, Inc. v. Unemployment Insurance Commission of the Department of EmploymentWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Nielsen v. EMPLOYMENT SEC. DEPT. OF STATECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  3. Terry v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  4. Cascade Nursing Services, Ltd. v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. Ortega v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API