Freeman-Sweet Co. v. Luminous Unit Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois. Suit by the Luminous Unit Company against the Freeman-Sweet Company and the Reflectolyte Company. From a decree for complainant (249 Fed. 876), defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
MACK, Circuit Judge.
The opinion sustaining the validity of letters patent No. 1,076,418 and finding infringement of claim 1, but not of claim 2, thereof, is reported in 249 Fed. 876. In a prior suit by appellee against R. Williamson & Co., both claim 1 and claim 2 were found valid and infringed. 241 Fed. 265, affirmed in this court 245 Fed. 988,-C. C. A. -. The facts, except those hereinafter set forth, bearing upon the making of appellant the Reflectolyte Co., a party defendant, will be found fully stated in these opinions.
[1] 1. This former decision, to which these appellants were not…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- National Brake & Electric Co. v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1919
- Luminous Unit Co. v. R. Williamson & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1917
- Luminous Unit Co. v. Freeman-Sweet Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1918
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gulf Smokeless Coal Co. v. Sutton, Steele & Steele.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
- Luminous Unit Co. v. Freeman-Sweet Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
- Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. v. Thermoco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- S. S. Kresge Co. v. Winget Kickernick Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Bechik Products, Inc. v. Flexible Products, Inc., a Corporation, and Morris Goldstein, Max Goldstein and Leo Goldstein, D/B/A Crown Mattress Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.